{"id":60,"date":"2008-05-30T05:00:28","date_gmt":"2008-05-30T11:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.consider.org\/blog\/?p=60"},"modified":"2008-05-30T05:00:28","modified_gmt":"2008-05-30T11:00:28","slug":"rational-evil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/2008\/05\/rational-evil\/","title":{"rendered":"Rational Evil"},"content":{"rendered":"

Listen to the MP3<\/span><\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In my review of Christopher Hitchens\u2019 \u201c<\/span><\/span>God Is Not Great<\/span><\/span><\/a>\u201d I was <\/span><\/span>discussing the relationship of reason to evil<\/span><\/span><\/a>, which has taken me beyond the scope of Hitchens\u2019 book. So I have decided to make this an independent series of posts, and will return to my review of Hitchens\u2019 book when I am done. To summarize for those who have not read <\/span><\/span>my comments on Hitchens\u2019 book<\/span><\/span><\/a> that got me here, I looked at how reason, unguided by moral values, can result in great evil, in particular how the secular evolutionary worldview when applied to society and culture resulted in Social Darwinism and Eugenics which supplied the rational underpinning for the Holocaust.\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

After the holocaust these sciences were rightly rejected. Yet they were not rejected for the normal scientific reasons. At the time the Judeo-Christian worldview still held great influence even if many were beginning to reject its underlying foundation. As such, these sciences were rejected more for the result they produced than any new scientific discovery that showed them to be wrong. \u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

More importantly people embraced the Judeo-Christian based concept of Human Rights a concept developed from the beliefs that we are all created in the image of God and are all equal in God eyes. Human Rights stem from this, as not even a King has the right to interfere with what God has given. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As the Judeo-Christian worldview weakened in the decades since WWII, so did the foundation of Human Rights. What does it mean to be equal in the eyes of God, if there is no God? Worst, the underlying rational of secular evolution remained in a question few would dare to seriously ask: \u00a0<\/span>If evolution is true, and we are just animals why shouldn\u2019t we treat each other as the animals we are and order society on the principles of evolution; on survival of the fittest? <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

To avoid having to deal with this question, a number of strategies have developed over time; all with their own serious problems.\u00a0 <\/span>Most seriously, reason itself was depreciated, replaced instead by emotion. Thinking implies thought, questions, examination, contemplation, analysis. Express a thought and people are libel to ask you what you mean, and worse, they might ask you to justify your thoughts, to back them up, with the simple question: Why? Feelings need no justification, they just are. \u201cThat\u2019s just how I feel about it\u201d is a perfectly acceptable emotional answer to the question: Why? <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As a result, we normally do not ask people what they think about something we ask them how they feel about it. \u00a0<\/span>To be sure, the avoidance of the implications of secular evolutionary thought has not been the only factor in this or the other things we will look at.\u00a0 <\/span>Here for example, there has also been the rise of the importance of visual media (which appeal first to the emotions), and the corresponding drop in reading (where symbols must first be process intellectually to be understood). Still, the avoidance of the implications of secular evolutionary thought have not only been a factor but also a unifying principle.\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The depreciation of reason in favor of emotion meant that uncomfortable questions and implications could just be ignored and thus avoided. But the attempt to avoid the rational implications of secular evolutionary thought through depreciation of reason resulted, not too surprisingly, in considerable irrationality.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As the foundation for Human Rights was rejected, equal in the eyes of God, became merely equal, which may sound good to those influenced by modern post WWII thought, but what does it mean to be equal? Equal in what sense? <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

I am certainly not equal with Tiger Woods when it comes to playing golf, and perhaps it is just my vanity, but I like to think that there are probably a few things where he is probably not my equal. In sports, work, knowledge, background, illnesses, health, in virtually every aspect of life equality is the rare exception if it exists at all. Each of us is different. Each of us is an individual with different strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages. So in what sense are we equal?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

For the Judeo-Christian worldview this is not a problem. God transcends all of this.\u00a0 <\/span>Thus to be equal in his eyes is far more important and transcends any of the differences among us. To be a better golfer, or have more knowledge of history; to be taller or faster; to have more money or power all may show a lack of equality in these areas, but the equality before God, is an equality of worth that transcends everything else. It can transcend everything else, because it is based in God who transcends everything. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

But the secular worldview does not allow for God. Thus there is no transcendant equality, because there is nothing transcendent in which to base such an equality. \u00a0<\/span>More importantly survival of the fittest argues strongly against equality in the first place. Therefore the question, and thus the problem remain. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Normally the question has been answered with dogmatic and undefined statements of equality. We are equal just because we are. But with such an unthinking approach, the differences among us become an ever present danger, lurking in the shadows threatening to bring the whole system down. \u00a0<\/span>Next time we will look at how the attempt to avoid this danger has changed how we look at everything, often with very negative effects. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

This is Elgin Hushbeck, asking you to <\/span>Consider Christianity<\/span><\/a>: <\/span>a Faith Based on Fact.<\/span><\/span><\/a>a<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Listen to the MP3\u00a0 \u00a0 In my review of Christopher Hitchens\u2019 \u201cGod Is Not Great\u201d I was discussing the relationship of reason to evil, which has taken me beyond the scope of Hitchens\u2019 book. So I have decided to make this an independent series of posts, and will return to my review of Hitchens\u2019 book […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,8,12,16],"tags":[197,199,206,274,493],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}