{"id":69,"date":"2008-08-15T05:00:01","date_gmt":"2008-08-15T11:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.consider.org\/blog\/?p=69"},"modified":"2008-08-15T05:00:01","modified_gmt":"2008-08-15T11:00:01","slug":"hitchens-god-is-not-great-x","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/2008\/08\/hitchens-god-is-not-great-x\/","title":{"rendered":"Hitchens – God is not Great X"},"content":{"rendered":"

Listen to the MP3<\/a><\/span><\/h2>\n

Continuing my extended review of Christopher Hitchens, \u201cGod Is Not Great<\/a>\u201d brings be to Chapter Four, which is called, \u201cA Note on Health, to which Religion Can be Hazardous.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0 In one sense is completely true. That some religious beliefs can be has hazardous to your health, is a statement few if any would disagree with.\u00a0 After all, in those religions that practiced human sacrifice, there was a definite health hazard for the one chosen to be sacrifice. However, I suspect that is not what Hitchens is arguing, as he is seeking a much more universal condemnation of religion.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

The problem is that the evidence he present does not support anything more universal.\u00a0 The evidence he presents is basically a stroll through, what even many believers in religion would considered the strange and bizarre. His initial offering is the account of how the attempt to eradicate polio from the world, where blocked by a few \u201cMuslim die-hards\u201d who claimed that that polio vaccine was really joint conspiracy between the United States and United Nation to sterilize true followers of Islam and thereby eradicate the faith. As a result of the ensuing fatwa against taking the vaccine, predictably polio, which had been on the verge of eradication, reemerged in Nigeria, and then to Mecca, from which pilgrims took it disease back to what had been polio free countries.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

While a sad and even maddening account, it is hardly an incitement of all of Islam, much less all religion. The reason Hitchens gives for these clerics issuing the fatwa against taking the vaccine had nothing to do with the teaching Islam concerning vaccines, or even medical care in general. It stemmed from a belief that the vaccine was part of a conspiracy. So if anything this is an indictment against that mode of thinking that tends to see grand conspiracies, and secret forces behind events, not an indictment of religion, accept that in this instance the conspiracy involved Islam.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Now perhaps Hitchens would have a point if such conspiracy theories were uniquely tied to religion, but a glance through the currently popular conspiracy theories argues strongly against this.\u00a0 Consider this partial list: That 9\/11 was an inside job; The Federal Reserve is part of a secret plan control the United States; the Moon landing was faked; The government is hiding evidence on UFO\u2019s; The Trilateral Commission is trying to take over the world; and of course the many and conflicting theories on the Kennedy Assassination. (I reject all of these as false.) All are secular conspiracies.\u00a0 In fact the first two are two of the three conspiracies addressed in the Zeitgeist the movie<\/a>, the third being that Christianity is itself a conspiracy to control society. When it comes to conspiracy theories that do involve Christianity some are defended by a few atheists such as the resurrection was really a conspiracy, by the early disciples.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Rather than being an indictment against religion one could probably make a good case that these are an indictment against secularism, for as G. K. Chesterton observed, \u201cWhen people stop believing in God, they don\u2019t believe in nothing \u2013 they believe in anything.\u201d\u00a0 Still, I would write them off as a particular problem of the human species, one of many.\u00a0 Such conspiracy thinking is certainly found among those who are religious, but it is hardly limited to the religious, nor is caused by religion.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

That Hitchens uses this as an indictment of religion in general reveals a very fundamental problem that pervades much of his book, and in fact is found in much of the writings of the neo-atheists.\u00a0 The problem centers around two logical fallacies, the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc, and the fallacy of Hasty generalization. I will look at Hasty generalization next time, as it is not only a problem here, but indicative of the examples throughout the rest of the chapter.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

As for the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc, it is also called the fallacy of false cause, and refers to claiming a causal relationship between two things, because on preceded the other.\u00a0 The fallacious reasoning behind this fallacy was clearly presented by one of my teachers by the following example. There is a definite relationship between the amount of concrete in an area, and the amount of rape, the more concrete per square mile, the more rape. Therefore concrete causes rape. Now even though the premises are correct, the conclusion is absurd. The reason for the relationship is that the more concrete, the more people, the more people the more rape. People cause rape, not concrete.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yet Hitchens\u2019 example is not much better.\u00a0 The fatwa against the vaccine was issue by people who were religious, therefore religion must be the problem. In reality the problem was not religion, but conspiracy theories, which are not inherently religious.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

This is a peculiar problem with so many of the neo-atheist arguments.\u00a0 They are purportedly arguing against religion because it is so irrational. And yet so many of their arguments are grounded in not only error, but irrationality.\u00a0 Now this was just Hitchens opening example, but, as I will discuss next time, the rest of the chapter, does not do much better.<\/p>\n

This is Elgin Hushbeck, asking you to Consider Christianity<\/a>: a Faith Based on Fact<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Listen to the MP3 Continuing my extended review of Christopher Hitchens, \u201cGod Is Not Great\u201d brings be to Chapter Four, which is called, \u201cA Note on Health, to which Religion Can be Hazardous.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0 In one sense is completely true. That some religious beliefs can be has hazardous to your health, is a statement few if […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3,6,14,16],"tags":[70,123,144,212,232,426,525],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/consider.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}